Guia docente
DATOS IDENTIFICATIVOS 2020_21
Asignatura CREACIÓN DE EMPRESAS Código 01726011
Enseñanza
1726 - M.U. INVESTIG.ADMON Y ECONOMÍA DE LA EMPRESA
Descriptores Cr.totales Tipo Curso Semestre
6 Optativa Primer Segundo
Idioma
Prerrequisitos
Departamento DIREC.Y ECONOMIA DE LA EMPRESA
Responsable
GONZÁLEZ ÁLVAREZ , NURIA
Correo-e ngona@unileon.es
amarc@unileon.es
Profesores/as
GONZÁLEZ ÁLVAREZ , NURIA
MARTÍNEZ CAMPILLO , ALMUDENA
Web http://
Descripción general
Tribunales de Revisión
Tribunal titular
Cargo Departamento Profesor
Presidente DIREC.Y ECONOMIA DE LA EMPRESA CABEZA GARCIA , LAURA
Secretario DIREC.Y ECONOMIA DE LA EMPRESA MUÑOZ DOYAGUE , MARIA FELISA
Vocal DIREC.Y ECONOMIA DE LA EMPRESA MIGUEL DAVILA , JOSE ANGEL
Tribunal suplente
Cargo Departamento Profesor
Presidente DIREC.Y ECONOMIA DE LA EMPRESA NIETO ANTOLIN , MARIANO
Secretario DIREC.Y ECONOMIA DE LA EMPRESA FERNANDEZ GAGO , ROBERTO
Vocal DIREC.Y ECONOMIA DE LA EMPRESA HERRERA , DANNY LILIANA

Competencias
Tipo A Código Competencias Específicas
Tipo B Código Competencias Generales y Transversales
Tipo C Código Competencias Básicas
  C1 Que los estudiantes sepan aplicar los conocimientos adquiridos y su capacidad de resolución de problemas en entornos nuevos o poco conocidos dentro de contextos más amplios (o multidisciplinares) relacionados con su área de estudio.

Resultados de aprendizaje
Resultados Competencias
Saber llevar a cabo una investigación científica competitiva en Creación de Empresas y planificar adecuadamente las tareas a realizar. C1

Contenidos
Bloque Tema
• Bases para la investigación en creación de empresas: Antecedentes teóricos, niveles de análisis y aspectos metodológicos
• Aspectos teórico-prácticos en la medición de la creación de empresas. Una aproximación macroeconómica
• Los factores determinantes del espíritu emprendedor del individuo
• Características del emprendedor
• Emprendedor social
• Corporate entrepreneurship
• Cultura, capital social y creación de empresas

Planificación
Metodologías  ::  Pruebas
  Horas en clase Horas fuera de clase Horas totales
Presentaciones/exposiciones 20 20 40
 
Tutorías 8 0 8
Trabajos 0 38 38
 
Sesión Magistral 20 27 47
 
Pruebas objetivas de preguntas cortas 2 15 17
 
(*)Los datos que aparecen en la tabla de planificación són de carácter orientativo, considerando la heterogeneidad de los alumnos

Metodologías
Metodologías   ::  
  descripción
Presentaciones/exposiciones Los alumnos deberán realizar una exposición de algun tema concreto asignado por los profesores
Tutorías Reuniones del profesor con los alumnos a petición de estos últimos con el fin de aclarar cualquier tipo de cuestión relacionada con la asignatura y su contenido
Trabajos Los alumnos deberán realizar y entregar trabajos por escrito asignados por los profesores de la asignatura
Sesión Magistral Se impartirán los contenidos teóricos del programa, procurando la participación activa del alumno.

Tutorías
 
descripción

Evaluación
  descripción calificación
Trabajos Los alumnos deberán realizar los trabajos que propongan los distintos profesores así como el trabajo final de la asignatura 50%
Pruebas objetivas de preguntas cortas Los alumnos deberán realizar un examen final con preguntas cortas al finalizar la asignatura 50&
 
Otros comentarios y segunda convocatoria

Para la segunda convocatoria los alumnos deberán realizar los trabajos propuestos asi como superar el examen final de la asignatura

Durante el desarrollo de las pruebas no se permitirá manejar ningún material. Queda terminantemente prohibida la tenencia y el uso de dispositivos móviles y/o electrónicos durante la celebración de las pruebas. La simple tenencia de dichos dispositivos así como de apuntes, libros, carpetas o materiales diversos no autorizados durante las pruebas de evaluación, supondrá la retirada inmediata del examen, su expulsión del mismo y su calificación como suspenso, comunicándose la incidencia a la Autoridad Académica del Centro para que realice las actuaciones previstas en las Pautas de Actuación en los Supuestos de Plagio, Copia o Fraude en Exámenes o Pruebas de Evaluación, aprobadas por la Comisión Permanente del Consejo de Gobierno de 29 de enero de 2015


ADENDA
Plan de contingencia para una situación de emergencia que impida actividades docentes presenciales
Enlace de acceso a la Adenda de la Guia docente por el COVID-19


Fuentes de información
Acceso a la Lista de lecturas de la asignatura

Básica

 

Aldrich, H. (1999).Organizations Evolving. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. 

Aldrich, H. E., & M. A. Martínez. (2001): Many are called, but few are chosen: An evolutionary perspective for the study of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), 41-56.

Aldrich, H., & Zimmer, C. (1986). Entrepreneurship through social networks.In D. Sexton & R. Smiler (eds.),The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship: 3-23. New York: Ballinger.

Alsos, G. A., and Kolvereid, L. (1998). The Gestation Process of Novice, Serial and Parallel Business Founders. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 22, 101-114. 

Alvarez, S. A. (2003). Resources and hierarchies: Intersections between entrepreneurship and strategy. In Z. J. Acs & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurshipresearch: 247–263. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2013). Epistemology, opportunities, and entrepreneurship: Comments on Venkataraman et al. (2012) and Shane (2012).Academy of Management Review, 38: 154–157.

Alvarez, S.A. & Barney, J.B. (2002). Resource-based theory and the entrepreneurial firms. In Hitt, M.A., Ireland, R.D., Camp, S.M. & Sexton, D.L. (Eds), Strategic entrepreneurship creating a new mindset (pp. 89-105). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

Amit, R., Glosten, L., & Mueller, E. (1993). Challenges to theory development in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Management Studies, 30: 815-834.

Anokhin, S., Wincent, J., and Autio, E. (2011): Operationalizing opportunities in entrepreneurship research: use of data envelopment analysis. Small Business Economics, 37, pp. 39-57.

ArthurW. (1989) Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In By Historical Events. Economic Journal99(394):116-131.

Audretsch, D.B. and A.R. Thurik (2001), What is new about the new economy: sources of growth in the managed and entrepreneurial economies, Industrial and CorporateChange19, 795-821.

BaronD. P. (1988)Regulationand Legislative Choice, RAND Journal of Economics, 19(3): 467-477.

Baumol, W. J. (1990), Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive, Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 893–921. 

Baumol, W. J. (1993). Entrepreneurship, Management and the Structure of Payoffs. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 

Baumol, W. J. (2002), The Free-Market Innovation Machine, Princeton University Press: Princeton and Oxford.

Birch, D. (1979). The Job Generating Process.Cambridge, MA: MIT Program on Neighborhood and Regional Change. 

Blackburn, R. and Smallbone, D. (2008), Researching small firms and entrepreneurship in the UK: developments and distinctiveness, Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice, 32(2): 267-288.

Busenitz et al., (2014):  Entrepreneurship Research (1985-2009) and the Emergence of Opportunities, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(5), pp. 981-1000.

Busenitz, L. W., & Barney, J. B. (1997). Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in small firms: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Ventur-ing, 12, 9-30. 

Busenitz, L. W., West, G. P., Shepherd, D., Nelson, T., Chandler, G. N., & Zacharakis, A. (2003). Entrepreneurship research in emergence: Past trends and future directions. Journal of Management, 29: 285–308.

Busenitz, L.W., Barney, J.W., (1997). Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing12 (6): 9–30.

Cacciotti, G., Hayton, J. C., Mitchell, J. R., & Giazitzoglu, A. (2016), “A reconceptualization of fear of failure in entrepreneurship”, Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 302-325.

Carroll, G., & Mosakowski, E. (1987). The career dynamics of selfemploymentAdministrative Science Quarterly32:570-589.

Carter, N. M., Gartner, W. B., & Reynolds, P. D. (1996). Exploring start-up event sequences. Journal of Business Venturing, 11, 151-166. 

Casson, Mark C. (1982). The Entrepreneur. An Economic Theory. Oxford: Martin Robertson.

Cohen and Levinthal (1989), Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D, The Economic Journal, Volume 99, September pg. 569-596.

Cooper, A. C. (2003). Entrepreneurship: The past, the present, the future. In Z. J. Acs & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research:21-34. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Cooper, A. C., Gimeno-Gascon, F. J., & Woo, C. Y. (1994). Initial human and financial capital as predictors of new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(5), 371-395.

Cooper, A.C., C.Y. Woo, & W.C. Dunkelberg. (1989) Entrepreneurship and the Initial Size of Firms.Journal of Business Venturing4(5): 317-332.

Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1986). The development and testing of an organizational-level Entrepreneurship scale. In R. Ronstadt, J. A. Hornaday, R. Peterson, & K. H. Vesper (Eds.), Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research (pp. 628-639). Wellesley, MA: Babson College. 

Davidson, P., & Henrekson, M. (2002). Determinants of the prevalence of start-ups and high growth firms. Small Business Economics, 19(2), 81-104.

Davidsson, P. (2003). ‘The domain of entrepreneurship research: some suggestions’. In Katz, J. A. and Shepherd, D. A. (Eds), Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, Vol. 6. Oxford: Elsevier/JAI Press, 315–72.

Davidsson, P., & J. Wiklund. (2001). Levels of analysis in entrepreneurship research: Current research practice and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory andPractice, 25(4), 81-99.

Davidsson, P., & Wiklund, J. (2000). Conceptual and empirical challenges in the study of firm growth. In D. Sexton & H. Landström (Eds.), The Blackwell Handbook of Entrepreneurship . Oxford, MA: Blackwell. 

Davidsson,P. and Honig, B. (2003), The Role of Social and Human Capital Among Nascent Entrepreneurs, Journal of Business Venturing, 18 (3): 301-331.

De Koning, A.J. (1999). Opportunity Formation From A Socio-Cognitive Perspective. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 258.

Drucker, P. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship. New York: Harper & Row.

Eckhardt, J., & Shane, S. (2003). Opportunities and entrepreneurship. Journal ofManagement, 29(3), 333-349.

Evans, D. y Leighton, L. (1989): Some empirical aspects of entrepreneurship, AmericanEconomic Review,  79: 519-535.

Gartner, W. B. (1988). "Who is an Entrepreneur" is the wrong question. American Small Business Journal (Spring), 11-31. 

Gartner, W. B., & Brush, C. B. (1999). Entrepreneurship as organizing: Emergence, newness, and transformation . Academy of Management Entrepreneurship DivisionDoctoral Consortium.

Guth, W. D., & Ginsberg, A. (1990). Guest editor’s introduction: Corporate entrepreneurship. Strategic Management Journal, 11(special issue): 5–16.

Hannan, M., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49, 149-164

Hayeck, F. (1948). Individualism and Economic Order, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Hills, G. E., Lumpkin, G. T., & Singh, R. P. (1997). Opportunity recognition: Perceptions and behaviors of entrepreneurs. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Wellesley, MA: Babson College.

Hsu, D.; Burmeister-Lamp, K.;  Simmons, A. S.; Foo, M. D.;  Hong, C. D;  Pipes, J. D. (2019): “I know I can, but I don't fit”: Perceived fit, self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial intention”, Journal of Business Venturing34 (2), 311-326

Ikujiro, N; Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press

Ireland, R.D.; Reutzel, C.R. & Webb, J.W. (2005). Entrepreneurship Research in AMJ: What Has Been Published, and What Might the Future Hold?, The Academy of Management Review, 48: 556–564.

Kahneman, D., Lovallo, D. (1993). Timid choices and bold forecasts: A cognitive perspective on risk-taking.Management Science39: 17–31

Kirzner, I. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kirzner, I. (1997). Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 35: 60-85. 

Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kirzner, I. M. (1979). Perception, Opportunity and Profit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kirzner, I. M. (1997) Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach. Journal of Economic Literature.XXXV: 60–85.

Knight, F. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit.New York: Augustus Kelley.

Krueger, N., & Dickson, P. R. (1994). How Believing in Ourselves Increases Risk Taking: Perceived Self-Efficacy and Opportunity Recognition. Decision Sciences, 25(3): 385-400.

Kuskova et al., (2011):  Effects of theoretical contribution, methodological rigor, and journal quality, on the impact of scale development articles in the field of entrepreneurship, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 5, pp. 10-36.

Low, M. B. (2001). The adolescence of entrepreneurship research: Specification of purpose. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26 (4): 17–25.

Low, M. B., & MacMillan, I. C. (1988). Entrepreneurship: past research and future challenges. Journal of Management 14, 139-161. 

Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172. 

Lynn, R. (1991). The Secret of the Miracle Economy. Different National Attitudes to Competi-tiveness and Money. London: The Social Affaires Unit. 

Martin, Bruce C., Jeffrey J. McNally, and Michael J. Kay. (2013). Examining the formation of human capital in entrepreneurship: A meta-analysis of entrepreneurship education outcomes. Journal of Business Venturing 28(2): 211-224. 

McClelland, D.C. (1961). The Achieving Society. NY: Van Nostrand.

McGrath, R. G. (1999). Falling forward: Real options reasoning and entrepreneurial failure. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 13-30. 

Meyer, G. D., Neck, H. M., & Meeks, M. D. (2002). The Entrepreneurship-Strategic Management Interface. In M. A. Hitt, R. D. Ireland, S. M. Camp & D. L. Sexton (Eds.), Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating a new mindset (pp. 19-44). Oxford: Blackwell.

Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science 29: 770-791. 

Mises, L. von. (1949). Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. Ludwig von Mises Institute.

Mölleryd, B. (1999). Entrepreneurship in Technological Systems--the Development of Mobile Telephony in Sweden (doctoral dissertation). Stockholm: The Economic Reserach Institute. 

Moran, P., & Ghoshal, S. (1999). Markets, firms, and the process of economic development. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 390-412. 

Piore, M. J., & Sabel, C. F. (1984). The Second Industrial Divide: Basic Books. 

Raffa, M., Zollo, G., & Caponi, R. (1996). The development process of small firms. Entrepreneur and Regional Development, 8, 359-372. 

Rosenbusch, N., Rauch, A., Bausch, A., (2013). The mediating role of entrepreneurial orientation in the task environment–performance relationship: a meta-analysis. Journal of Management39, 633–659

Rumelt, R. P. (1987). Theory, strategy and entrepreneurship. In The Competitive Challenge.Ed. David J. Teece. New York: Harper & Row, 137-158.

Sarasvathy, S. D. (1999). Decision making in the absence of markets: As empirically grounded model of entrepreneurial expertise. School of Business: University of Washington. 

Sarasvathy, S. D., Simon, H. A, and Lave, L. B. (1998). Perceiving and managing business risks: Differences between entrepreneurs and bankers, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 33(2): 207-226.

Schmookler, J. (1966). Invention and Economic Growth. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Schumpeter, J. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge: MA: Harvard University Press. 

Schumpeter, J.A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper.

Shane, S. (1992). Why do some societies invent more than others? Journal of Business Venturing, 7: 29-46. 

Shane, S. (1996). Why franchise companies expand overseas, Journal of BusinessVenturing, vol. 11(2), pages 73-88.

Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science,11(4), 448-469.

Shane, S. (2012). Reflections on the 2010 AMR Decade Award: Delivering on the promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 37: 10–20

Shane, S., and Venkataraman, S. (2000). The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research. The Academy of Management Review,25(1): 217-226.

Shepherd, D.A., & Zacharakis, A.L. (2001). Speed to initial public offering of VC-backed companies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,25(3): 59-70.

Sigrist, B. (1999). Entrepreneurial opportunity recognition, A presentation at the Annual UIC/AMA symposium at Marketing/Entrepreneurship Interface, Sofia-Antipolis, France.

Simon, M., Houghton, S. M., & Aquino, K. (2000).Cognitive biases, risk perception and venture formation: How individuals decide to start companies. Journal of BusinessVenturing, 15(2), 113-134.

Stam, W., Arzlamian, S. and Elfring, T. (2014). Social capital of entrepreneurs and small firm performance: A meta-analysis of contextual and methodological moderators. Journal of BusinessVenturing, 29(1), 152-176 

Stephan, U., & Pathak, S. (2016). Beyond cultural values? Cultural leadership ideals and entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(5), 505-523 

Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, P., & Wright, M., (2001). The Focus of Entrepreneurial Research: Contextual and Process IssuesEntrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Summer 2001.

Utterback, J. (1994). Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation.Harvard Business School Press: Boston.

Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: An editor's perspective. In J. Katz & R. Brockhaus (Eds.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firmemergence, and growth, 3:119-138. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. 

Venkataraman, S., Sarasvathy, S. D., Dew, N., & Forster, W. R. (2012). Reflections on the 2010 AMR Decade Award: Whither the promise? Moving forward with entrepreneurship as a science of the artificial. Academy of Management Review, 37: 21–33

Vesper, K. H. (1982). Introduction and summary of entrepreneurship research. In C. A. Kent, D. H. Sexton, & K. H. Vesper (Eds.), Encyclopedia of entrepreneurship:xxxi-xxxviii.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Walsh, S. T. (1995). The Role of Core Capabilities in Producing Competitive Advantage: Longitudinal Evidence from the Semiconductor Silicon Industry. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY. 

Walsh, S. T., & Kirchhoff, B. A. (1998). The influence of competencies and capabilities on strategies and performance of technology intensive new ventures. Paper presented at the ICSB World Conference, Naples. Italy. 

Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M. & Vaid, J. (1997). Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Wiklund, J. (1998). Small Firm Growth and Performance: Entrepreneurship and Beyond. Jönköping: Jönköping International Business School. 

Wiklund, J., Davidsson, P., Audretsch, D. B. and Karlsson, C. (2011). The future of entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35 (1), pp. 1-9.

Wiklund, J.; Nikolaev, B.; Shin, N.; Foo, M-D. And Bradley, S. (2019). Entrepreneurship and well-being: Past, present, and future, Journal of Business Venturing, In press

Zahra, S. (1991). Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship: An explorative study. Journal of Business Venturing, 6, 259-285. 

Complementaria


Recomendaciones